First Midwest BankFirst Midwest Bank logoArrow DownIcon of an arrow pointing downwardsArrow LeftIcon of an arrow pointing to the leftArrow RightIcon of an arrow pointing to the rightArrow UpIcon of an arrow pointing upwardsBank IconIcon of a bank buildingCheck IconIcon of a bank checkCheckmark IconIcon of a checkmarkCredit-Card IconIcon of a credit-cardFunds IconIcon of hands holding a bag of moneyAlert IconIcon of an exclaimation markIdea IconIcon of a bright light bulbKey IconIcon of a keyLock IconIcon of a padlockMail IconIcon of an envelopeMobile Banking IconIcon of a mobile phone with a dollar sign in a speech bubbleMoney in Home IconIcon of a dollar sign inside of a housePhone IconIcon of a phone handsetPlanning IconIcon of a compassReload IconIcon of two arrows pointing head to tail in a circleSearch IconIcon of a magnifying glassFacebook IconIcon of the Facebook logoLinkedIn IconIcon of the LinkedIn LogoXX Symbol, typically used to close a menu
FDIC-Insured - Backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. Government
Medium wide shot business owner discussing project with colleague in office
Get Insights

Get monthly ideas delivered right to your inbox.

Subscribe for Insights

For Your Business Nash Stewart Ogletree Smoak Deakins P.C. September 23, 2024

Political Speech in the Workplace: Strategic Considerations for Employers

Political speech in the workplace has become a growing concern for employers in recent years. The polarized political climate, combined with the increasing use of social media and digital communication, has amplified the visibility and impact of employees’ political views.

While political discourse can foster vibrant and diverse ideas, it also poses significant challenges for employers. Balancing employees’ rights with the need to maintain a harmonious and productive work environment requires a nuanced approach. This article explores strategic considerations for employers in addressing political speech in the workplace as we approach a historic presidential election.

Quick Hits

  • The First Amendment generally applies to governmental actors, but private employers still must comply with the NLRA, which protects employees’ right to engage in concerted activity related to their working conditions.
  • Several states, including California, Connecticut, Colorado, and New York, provide additional protections for speech, off-duty conduct, and political affiliations and beliefs for private-sector employees.
  • Employer strategies for maintaining positive, productive workplaces include developing and updating workplace speech policies, providing training and education related to maintaining a respectful and inclusive work environment, encouraging respectful dialogue, and promptly monitoring and addressing issues.

The Legal Landscape

Employers must navigate a complex web of federal and state laws when addressing political speech in the workplace. The First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, which protects free speech, generally applies to governmental actors and not to private employers. Private employers have more latitude than public employers when it comes to regulating political speech.

However, private employers must comply with the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA), which protects employees’ right to engage in concerted activity related to working conditions, which may include discussing politics. Additionally, various state laws provide protections for employees’ political activities and affiliations. For instance, California and New York prohibit employers from discriminating against employees based on their political beliefs or activities.

Possible Risks of Political Speech in the Workplace

Workplace conflict and morale: Political discussions can lead to heated arguments and create a divisive work environment. This can lower employee morale, reduce productivity, increase turnover, and perhaps at worst, result in workplace violence.

Discrimination and harassment claims: Political speech can sometimes cross the line into discriminatory or harassing behavior, leading to potential legal claims. For example, political discussions that touch on race, gender, or other protected characteristics may result in claims of a hostile work environment.

Reputation and public relations: Controversial statements made by employees, especially those in leadership positions, can damage the company’s reputation and lead to public backlash.

State Law Considerations

Even in the absence of federal constitutional or statutory protections, several states have laws that may afford additional protections for employees, thereby limiting private employers’ ability to restrict their employees’ political activities. These considerations include:

  • Statutes that protect private employees’ political activities: Some states, including California, have statutes that specifically protect private employees’ political activities from employer interference, discrimination, or retaliation.
  • Statutes that afford broad free speech protections without regard to state action: A few states, including Connecticut, have broad free speech provisions without a state action requirement. However, these states may include exceptions centered on whether the employees’ activity substantially interferes with the employers’ interests or employees’ job performance.
  • “Off-duty” protections: Other states, such as Colorado, have statutes that protect employees’ lawful off-duty activities, conduct, and/or speech. These statutes are sometimes referred to as “lifestyle” statutes. However, these statutes may also contain exceptions to the general rules if, for example, an employee’s activities create a conflict of interest.

Key Strategies for Employers

Developing or updating policies: Employers may want to create comprehensive policies that address political speech in the workplace. Ideally, these policies would clearly define acceptable and unacceptable behaviors and outline the consequences for violations. Applying these policies consistently can help avoid claims of bias or discrimination.

Training and education: Regular training sessions can help employees understand the company’s policies and the importance of maintaining a respectful and inclusive work environment. Training typically emphasizes the distinction between personal opinions and professional conduct. As the election draws closer, consider recirculating company policies related to workplace conduct.

Encouraging respectful dialogue: Employers can foster a culture of respect by encouraging employees to engage in civil discourse and respect differing viewpoints. This can be achieved through workshops, team-building activities, and open forums where employees can discuss sensitive topics in a controlled and respectful manner.

Monitoring and addressing issues promptly: Employers may want to have mechanisms in place to monitor conduct in the workplace and address issues promptly. This includes having a clear process for employees to report concerns and ensuring that all complaints are investigated thoroughly and impartially.

Key Takeaways

The dangers of political speech in the workplace are multifaceted, encompassing legal, social, and operational risks. For small and large corporations, developing strategies that balance the need for a respectful and inclusive work environment with the rights of employees is a key strategy. By implementing clear policies, providing training, and fostering respectful dialogue, organizations can navigate the challenges of political speech and create a harmonious workplace.

 

This article was written by Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoke & Stuart, P.C. from National Law Review and was legally licensed through the DiveMarketplace by Industry Dive. Please direct all licensing questions to legal@industrydive.com.

Subscribe for Insights

Subscribe